![]() In the Plex docker container you could then just have one volume mapping for all the media (/media to /mnt/user/media) and then in the Plex server itself browse to /media/ to assign folders to libraries for the different media types as you are currently doing.Īgain, there is no advantage to doing it one way or another other than personal preference regarding media organization on the server.įrom an organizational standpoint it makes a lot of sense. You could accomplish the same thing in Plex by having just one share for all your media (/mnt/user/media) in unRAID with subfolders for media type. I have two servers running one on synology and one on nVidia SHIELD TV. I am in the same boat and i also canot make synology see my files. Then check your shared folder permissions and see if that same account has permissions set. It could just as easily be done if the media types are subfolders of one media share. Go into Control Panel > User and check if there is a Plex account created. I have cloud backups and on-site backup server backups organized by media type and keeping them separate is simply they way I prefer to do it. etc.) simply for organizational purposes. I prefer separate shares in unRAID by media type (top level folder for Movies, Photos, Videos, Music, etc.) and separate Plex container volume mappings (/movies to /mnt/user/Movies, /pictures to /mnt/user/Pictures. If you’re a frequent downloader of new media, you can set it so that Plex automatically updates its library any time it detects a new file has been added. If you happen to have a media file that is named wrongly it either wont. There is no performance or operational advantage to having separate volume mappings in a docker container or separate shares in the unRAID array organized by media type. For those that arent familiar with it, Plex REQUIRES a particular filename format. Just thought I'd ask before I start migrate 23TB of media. ![]() I have my Plex container path /media and host path /mnt/user/media which has subfolders (movies, tv shows, etc). Is there a benefit to this I am not seeing? I ask because I am in the process of moving my media from a Synology box that I was running the Plex package on to the Unraid server I built. ![]() Root has access to the files, but the protection, group, and ownership. Hmmm the shell session I get (from the jails page, the menu at the right side of the line for the plex jail) runs as root. Inside the jail, I can see and access the files on the mountpoint from a shell session. I have noticed a lot of people have a separate container for movies, tv shows, music, etc. On the FreeNAS system itself there is no user PLEX or UID 972. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |